General

Hi,I created and use a credential app in my workflows. The user has to provide the credentials (on-promise). When I connect to the oauth server, it works up to the provider unique identifier. It calls my endpoint, I return a JSON as described. But after that, I can not use the Credential feature. I have to start from the beginning. What is missing to complete the process?Thanks and best regards, Marcus

Hi,I’m using the new Credentials app feature (under Build → Features → Credentials, not the legacy credentials field) to authenticate with a third‑party service in monday workflows. Behavior I’m seeing: User installs the app and connects an account via the Credentials feature. User then uninstalls the app. Later, the same user reinstalls the app. When they go to connect again, they still see the old credentials available to select, which makes it look like we didn’t delete anything on uninstall. From the docs, I understand that: Credentials are securely stored and scoped to the app, and can be reused across workflow features. Privacy & security requirements say that when an app is de‑authorized/uninstalled, app data should be deleted within 10 days unle

I have an automation block (well, actually several of course). It can be triggered fromA workflow An automation Within Sidekick AII want to track usage so that I can assess how my app is being used.How can I tell where the block was triggered from? How can I tell which of the above use cases is the most popular?  Can the payload in the block be used to differentiate where it was triggered from? If not, why not? Make it so pleeeeease.

SDK SDK SDK. So many SDKs! Help me understand if I’m wrong. Software development kit https://developer.monday.com/apps/docs/introduction-to-the-sdk - Last commit: 1 month ago JavaScript SDK https://developer.monday.com/apps/docs/monday-code-javascript-sdk - Last commit: 9 months ago API SDK https://developer.monday.com/api-reference/docs/api-sdk - Last commit: 1 week ago Seems like the last one is the most actively maintained but I still cannot trust it because there are so many SDKs! Which one should be my go to and how do I kn

Hi everyone,I'm encountering a persistent quota issue while trying to deploy a new server-side app to monday code.The Issue: When running mapps code:push -i <APP_ID>, the build succeeds but the deployment fails with: ✖ You've reached the maximum allowed number of apps connected to monday-code.Context: I am working on an Organization account. I previously had few private test apps. Some were using Client-side hosting, and I was attempting to set up this new one on Server-side (monday code). I am aware of the 5-app limit for private apps on monday code. Steps Taken to Resolve: App Cleanup: I have already deleted the previous private test apps that were using the hosting slots.

Hey all! Welcome to the fresh-from-the-oven, new developers community hub!This place was built all for you, you can find here the latest apps framework and API updates, a space to request features and share ideas, community support for app development and the GraphQL API and info about our community webinars, workshops, and developer events.Before you start, important note: if you already had a user name for the community.monday.com, we probably migrated your username and all your contribution history to the new platform, please reset your password here

 In the example above, the contact, Sam Jones <sam@apple.com> has emailed someone. The avatar and heading are for Sam.If I was to add an activity on the contact’s behalf, I’d want to add the contact’s avatar & name rather than my own (which is what would happen by default).Is there a way to add that the Contact as the person who performed the activity rather than the person who added it using the API?So far, this seems to be a limitation of the create_timeline_item mutation. Dev Sidekick says:Looking at the available arguments for create_timeline_item, there is no parameter to specify a different user as the activity performer. The mutation's arguments are:item_id, custom_activity_id,

Hey everyone,My name is Natt. I’m part of the team building OnboardFlow, an employee onboarding app designed to work with monday.com. We come from an HR SaaS background, and onboarding was one problem we kept seeing everywhere. New hires chasing documents over email. HR tracking progress in spreadsheets. Tasks scattered across tools. Nobody fully sure what’s the overall progress. No one can change this into meaningful KPIs. So we built OnboardFlow to simplify that. HR teams continue managing onboarding inside monday.com — creating plans, assigning tasks, reviewing documents — while new hires use a simple mobile app (iOS & Android) to complete everything from their phone using an invite code. Tech stackReact + Laravel + Flutter We chose monday.com because we love how easy HR teams use it to run their daily works in it.  Always happy to connect with other builders here, especially anyon

Hello,In order to report an action block result, the documentation mentions:“This JWT is then sent in the Authorization header as a Bearer token. It should include your appId in the payload.”While the example shows no mention of “Bearer”:# The `callbackUrl` received from monday in the initial POST request bodyPOST https://callback-to-monday.com/callbacks/12345678 HTTP/1.1Content-Type: application/jsonAuthorization: <SIGNED_JWT_TOKEN>The example is the way to go. A token sent as Bearer will not work.Thank you,

I’m trying to create a dynamic field mapping for my automations/workflows using object fields.While I’m able to list the fields correctly, all of them are flagged as required, which doesn’t match my expectations. In the payload, the fields are marked as nullable (as described in the documentation):body = { name: { title: 'User name', type: 'primitive', primitiveType: 'string', isNullable: true, isArray: true, }, email: { title: 'Email', type: 'primitive', primitiveType: 'string', isNullable: true, isArray: false, },}; Is

Hey,Is anyone currently able to register create_subitem webhooks via the API? I’ve started getting 5xx errors — this was working fine earlier. 

Hello, I would like to understand the output fields that are available for all automation triggers. Including pre-defined Monday triggers.  There does not appear to be a tool in the UI, not in the automation runtime view, in the sentence creation or in the app development UI. Is there an API I can call that will provide me the outputs for a trigger.  Say, for example: “When a status-column changes to X” Do I get the boardId, itemId, status-column and status-column-values? Where is this defined? How do examine the output field schema? CheersJem 

 We’ve just launched a powerful upgrade to SMS to Board, introducing a fully redesigned SMS & Numbers Dashboard and advanced number management capabilities.Here’s what’s new:📞 Smarter Phone Number Search & ReservationYou now have complete control when reserving numbers. No more random assignment — you choose the number.: 🌍 Select country before searching 📱 Choose number type (mobile, etc.) 🔎 Search by area code or specific number pattern 🎯 Find numbers containing specific digits 📋 Browse available numbers before renting ✅ Select the exact number that fits your business needs

HI, I am using the API version 2024-01 and since recently the value field returns null on connect boards.As an example  { boards(ids: my-id) { items_page(limit: 1) { items { column_values (ids: "boards_verbinden__1") { id type value text } } } }}returns{ "data": { "boards": [ { "items_page": { "items": [ { "column_values": [ { "id": "boards_verbinden__1", "type": "board_relation", "value": null, "text": null } ] } ] } } ] }

Hi,due to migration of my app to workflows I try to use the credential feature to initiate OAuth to a Mattermost server. Unfortunately, Mattermost only accepts a length of 1024 characters for the state field. The state that the credential feature sends is about 1152 character long and so the request is rejected. Is there a chance to set a limit of the state field in the feature?Thanks and best regards, Marcus

Hello monday.com Developer Community,I'm a first-time monday.com app developer trying to set up my development environment to build an Integration app using the Quickstart Integration tutorial. I'm encountering several issues and would appreciate guidance on the complete setup process. Current issue:When I try to deploy using mapps code:push, I get the error: "Failed in uploading the project." The deployment shows as "pending" but never completes.What I need help understanding:Complete deployment workflow - What are the correct steps from code download to working app? Local development vs deployment - Should I test locally first using a tunnel, or deploy directly to monday code? Configuration in Developer Center - Where exactly do I add the Base URL for my integration feature? Environment setup - Ar

Hey builders 👋We’ve just published the first monday Marketplace & Developer Monthly Digest of 2026.The goal of this format is simple:Once a month, we’ll recap the most important platform updates for app developers in one quick video.This first one comes with a slight delay, but we’re officially kicking things off. I’d really love your feedback on the format. Watch it here:Here’s what we covered🚀 Build Skills for monday SidekickSidekick is officially out of beta, and developers can now build AI-powered skills for their apps.Read the full announcement here⚠️ Action Required: Migrate Legacy Automation FeaturesLegacy automation features mus

Hi everyone,I’m working on an integration where, when a user triggers an API action, my app fetches data from a third-party service and updates multiple columns on a Monday board.The main challenge I’m facing is how to handle column IDs in a clean and scalable way.Currently: I usually rely on column fields in the recipe to get the columnId, which works fine. However, when I need to update many columns (for example 5–10 columns), adding that many column fields makes the recipe sentence very long and not clean. I tried using item values, but they only return the columnId without any clear reference to which column it belongs to. If I use dynamic mapping, I lose access to the actual columnId, which my integration logic still needs. So my question is:Is

Hi there!The docs recommend using change_multiple_column_values when possible but never mention how it reduces complexity cost and by how much.Let’s put the question this way: If we use change_simple_column_value to change 1 column it costs 30k complexity points. So 10 column changes = 300k.Is it that if we use change_multiple_column_values all of 10 changes at once costs only 30k? How does this get calculated?

Hello,I am currently building an automation app for monday.com that allows users to automate workflows within their boards.So far, I have successfully completed authentication and all other required setup. I have also built several custom views and implemented the Integration Sentence Builder feature. The recipe sentence automation builder is working well overall.However, I am currently stuck while building a dynamic recipe sentence UI inside the Integration Sentence Builder. I have already posted in the community and sent an email to monday.com support, but I have not received a response yet. That’s why I’m writing with a detailed explanation of what I’m trying to achieve and where I’m facing difficulties.What I want to buildI want to create a recipe sentence like:When {status} changes to {something}, send {template name} {dynamically loaded inputs based on the template} from {WhatsApp account num

Hi everyone!I’ve been experimenting with the change_multiple_column_values mutation to update the Files Column with external links (like Google Drive). While the documentation currently lists this as unsupported for this specific mutation, I found that it actually works—with one major catch regarding fileId. The MethodI am using the following mutation:mutation updateFileLink ($columnValues: JSON!) { change_multiple_column_values( item_id: "my_item_id", board_id: "my_board_id", column_values: $columnValues ) { id }}With this JSON as columnValues variable:{ "file_column_id": { "files": [ { "fileId": "file1_id", "fileType": "GOOGLE_DRIVE", "linkToFile": "https://drive.google.com/...",

Hi there,I am curious to know if you have plans to drop support for settings_str at any point since you have switched to the settings instead?