Recently active topics

Hi,I created and use a credential app in my workflows. The user has to provide the credentials (on-promise). When I connect to the oauth server, it works up to the provider unique identifier. It calls my endpoint, I return a JSON as described. But after that, I can not use the Credential feature. I have to start from the beginning. What is missing to complete the process?Thanks and best regards, Marcus

Hi,I’m using the new Credentials app feature (under Build → Features → Credentials, not the legacy credentials field) to authenticate with a third‑party service in monday workflows. Behavior I’m seeing: User installs the app and connects an account via the Credentials feature. User then uninstalls the app. Later, the same user reinstalls the app. When they go to connect again, they still see the old credentials available to select, which makes it look like we didn’t delete anything on uninstall. From the docs, I understand that: Credentials are securely stored and scoped to the app, and can be reused across workflow features. Privacy & security requirements say that when an app is de‑authorized/uninstalled, app data should be deleted within 10 days unless there is explicit consent to retain it. However, I couldn’t find any documentation that explains: Whether credentials created via the Credentials app feature are supposed to persist across uninstall/reinstall. Whether the

I have an automation block (well, actually several of course). It can be triggered fromA workflow An automation Within Sidekick AII want to track usage so that I can assess how my app is being used.How can I tell where the block was triggered from? How can I tell which of the above use cases is the most popular?  Can the payload in the block be used to differentiate where it was triggered from? If not, why not? Make it so pleeeeease.

SDK SDK SDK. So many SDKs! Help me understand if I’m wrong. Software development kit https://developer.monday.com/apps/docs/introduction-to-the-sdk - Last commit: 1 month ago JavaScript SDK https://developer.monday.com/apps/docs/monday-code-javascript-sdk - Last commit: 9 months ago API SDK https://developer.monday.com/api-reference/docs/api-sdk - Last commit: 1 week ago Seems like the last one is the most actively maintained but I still cannot trust it because there are so many SDKs! Which one should be my go to and how do I know a new one is not going to be created without me knowing? Are these for different purposes and all are actively maintained (serously doubt it)?

If you're using Cursor and want to connect the monday.com MCP servers (both the platform API and the apps framework), here's a guide covering the real-world problems you'll run into and how to solve them. This is especially relevant if you work with multiple monday.com instances (e.g., dev, staging, production, or separate accounts for different purposes). The setupmonday.com provides two MCP packages: @mondaydotcomorg/monday-api-mcp — for workspace automation (platform API)@mondaydotcomorg/monday-api-mcp@latest --mode apps — for the apps frameworkBoth are configured in ~/.cursor/mcp.json. For a single instance, the docs work fine. But things get interesting when you have multiple instances. Problem 1: The ENOTEMPTY race conditionWhen you configure multiple MCP servers using the same npx package, Cursor starts them all simultaneously at launch. Each one tries to install/update the package into the same shared npx cache directory — and they collide:npm error ENOTEMPTY: directory not emp

In the recent webinar regarding the migration of the automations and in the developers Slack, it was mentioned that the shortLivedToken of an Async Action would be valid for 30 minutes.However, when I just tested it, it turned out that it's only valid for 5 minutes.In order for us to do the migration in our apps, we'd need that advertised 30 minutes. Can someone clarify when this will be changed to 30 minutes?-- Simon

Hi everyone,I'm encountering a persistent quota issue while trying to deploy a new server-side app to monday code.The Issue: When running mapps code:push -i <APP_ID>, the build succeeds but the deployment fails with: ✖ You've reached the maximum allowed number of apps connected to monday-code.Context: I am working on an Organization account. I previously had few private test apps. Some were using Client-side hosting, and I was attempting to set up this new one on Server-side (monday code). I am aware of the 5-app limit for private apps on monday code. Steps Taken to Resolve: App Cleanup: I have already deleted the previous private test apps that were using the hosting slots. Disconnecting: I searched for a manual "Disconnect" option in the Developer Center but found only the "Delete" option for these apps. Verification: Despite having fewer than 5 active apps in my Developer Center, the CLI still reports that the maximum number has been reached. Question: Does deleting an

Hey Community! For those of you who don’t know, I’m not a technical person, but we've had our Apps MCP for about 3 months, so I decided to challenge myself by building a simple to-do list application for monday with it.You can check out my journey, which documents: The step-by-step process of using monday.com Apps MCP to construct a functional tool. Creating a solution with task lists and checkboxes to manage items like cooking dinner or cleaning the house. And yes - it took some “prompt fixes” from my side, but in less than 30 minutes (less than 22 minutes, originally) the app was up! Check out the full video linked below for the complete build walkthrough and share that excitement!Let me know in the comments: what’s one small, useful app you'd love to build for yourself or your team without needing to code? Or - what would you add to your existing app/s leveraging the Apps MCP? 

We’re introducing Object storage for monday code (BLOB), a native way for apps to store large files directly within the monday infrastructure.Object storage is designed for large, unstructured data such as media files, documents and generated assets. It enables apps to store and retrieve files efficiently and cost-effectively, without relying on external storage services.Why this mattersMany apps need to store or generate files: exports, media assets, AI outputs, or reports. Until now, this often meant working around storage limits or integrating third-party file storage.With native Object storage, you can: Store large files at scale without hitting existing storage limits  Keep all customer data within monday, increasing trust and simplifying governance Eliminate external storage setup, credentials, and operational overhead Build file-heavy and AI-driven workflows more easily. If your app creates, processes, or persists files, Obejct storage is the right foundation.What you can

Hey all! Welcome to the fresh-from-the-oven, new developers community hub!This place was built all for you, you can find here the latest apps framework and API updates, a space to request features and share ideas, community support for app development and the GraphQL API and info about our community webinars, workshops, and developer events.Before you start, important note: if you already had a user name for the community.monday.com, we probably migrated your username and all your contribution history to the new platform, please reset your password here (also, check if the mail went to spam) and login to your existing user!If you can’t reset your password, please let us know here with your details and we’ll reset it for youAlso, we would like to get your feedback! please tell us what you think here! 

 In the example above, the contact, Sam Jones <sam@apple.com> has emailed someone. The avatar and heading are for Sam.If I was to add an activity on the contact’s behalf, I’d want to add the contact’s avatar & name rather than my own (which is what would happen by default).Is there a way to add that the Contact as the person who performed the activity rather than the person who added it using the API?So far, this seems to be a limitation of the create_timeline_item mutation. Dev Sidekick says:Looking at the available arguments for create_timeline_item, there is no parameter to specify a different user as the activity performer. The mutation's arguments are:item_id, custom_activity_id, title, timestamp (required) content, summary, time_range, url, phone, location (optional)[create_timeline_item]None of these allow you to attribute the activity to a specific contact or user other than the API caller. The knowledge sources do not mention any way to override the author/performer

Hey everyone,My name is Natt. I’m part of the team building OnboardFlow, an employee onboarding app designed to work with monday.com. We come from an HR SaaS background, and onboarding was one problem we kept seeing everywhere. New hires chasing documents over email. HR tracking progress in spreadsheets. Tasks scattered across tools. Nobody fully sure what’s the overall progress. No one can change this into meaningful KPIs. So we built OnboardFlow to simplify that. HR teams continue managing onboarding inside monday.com — creating plans, assigning tasks, reviewing documents — while new hires use a simple mobile app (iOS & Android) to complete everything from their phone using an invite code. Tech stackReact + Laravel + Flutter We chose monday.com because we love how easy HR teams use it to run their daily works in it.  Always happy to connect with other builders here, especially anyone working on monday.com integrations or mobile companion apps. Check it out - https://monday.com/ma

Hi everyone,I’m Dominik Kostencki, a software developer on monday’s marketplace team.We’ve just released a new update that enables developers to grant discounts to accounts on their active plan or on future plans they may choose.You can now apply discounts to any account - subscribed or not - without requiring users to cancel their subscription or uninstall the app. You decide whether the discount applies to the customer’s current plan or to specific plans they might move to next, giving you more control over upgrade paths and pricing flexibility.This provides new flexibility for retention campaigns, rewarding loyal customers, and offering personalized incentives with minimal friction. It’s been a highly requested capability for partners looking to optimize their monetization strategy, and we’re excited to make it available to all marketplace partners.Learn more here:Create a discount Delete a discount Discounts - general API 

Hello,In order to report an action block result, the documentation mentions:“This JWT is then sent in the Authorization header as a Bearer token. It should include your appId in the payload.”While the example shows no mention of “Bearer”:# The `callbackUrl` received from monday in the initial POST request bodyPOST https://callback-to-monday.com/callbacks/12345678 HTTP/1.1Content-Type: application/jsonAuthorization: <SIGNED_JWT_TOKEN>The example is the way to go. A token sent as Bearer will not work.Thank you,

I’m trying to create a dynamic field mapping for my automations/workflows using object fields.While I’m able to list the fields correctly, all of them are flagged as required, which doesn’t match my expectations. In the payload, the fields are marked as nullable (as described in the documentation):body = { name: { title: 'User name', type: 'primitive', primitiveType: 'string', isNullable: true, isArray: true, }, email: { title: 'Email', type: 'primitive', primitiveType: 'string', isNullable: true, isArray: false, },}; Is the documenation outdated, the code wrong or is there a bug?

Hey,Is anyone currently able to register create_subitem webhooks via the API? I’ve started getting 5xx errors — this was working fine earlier. 

So when the legacy automation builder is turned off, what happens to any automations in templates that were created using it? I ask because technically you can’t create new automations on the old infra - but maybe templates will continue to work.

A while back, I accidentally sent the same Slack message five times to hundreds of community membersIt happened because I was relying on a fragile automation flow. One small mistake and it cascaded.Instead of trying to patch the automation again, I decided to rebuild the workflow from scratch using AI.I used Cursor to generate a small internal tool that: Connects as a Slack bot Lets me send controlled bulk messages Adds simple guardrails to prevent duplicate sends Includes a preview step before pushing anything live Logs activity so I can trace what happened Time to working version: about 30 minutes. It’s not a polished SaaS product. It’s a focused internal tool built around one very specific pain point.What stood out to me is how different the mindset feels now. A year ago, I would have searched for a tool or tried to stretch an automation platform beyond its limits. Now, if the logic is clear, I can just build the layer I need.For those of you building products: Are you using

Hello, I would like to understand the output fields that are available for all automation triggers. Including pre-defined Monday triggers.  There does not appear to be a tool in the UI, not in the automation runtime view, in the sentence creation or in the app development UI. Is there an API I can call that will provide me the outputs for a trigger.  Say, for example: “When a status-column changes to X” Do I get the boardId, itemId, status-column and status-column-values? Where is this defined? How do examine the output field schema? CheersJem 

 We’ve just launched a powerful upgrade to SMS to Board, introducing a fully redesigned SMS & Numbers Dashboard and advanced number management capabilities.Here’s what’s new:📞 Smarter Phone Number Search & ReservationYou now have complete control when reserving numbers. No more random assignment — you choose the number.: 🌍 Select country before searching 📱 Choose number type (mobile, etc.) 🔎 Search by area code or specific number pattern 🎯 Find numbers containing specific digits 📋 Browse available numbers before renting ✅ Select the exact number that fits your business needs  🔗 Advanced Board Linking & Field MappingWe’ve added deeper integration controls: Link each phone number to a specific workspace Choose the exact board that will receive messages Map SMS data to custom board columns: Sender number Message text Date column Assign a custom alias/name to each phone number (e.g., “Sales Line”, “Support UK”, “Marketing Campaign”) This giv

HI, I am using the API version 2024-01 and since recently the value field returns null on connect boards.As an example  { boards(ids: my-id) { items_page(limit: 1) { items { column_values (ids: "boards_verbinden__1") { id type value text } } } }}returns{ "data": { "boards": [ { "items_page": { "items": [ { "column_values": [ { "id": "boards_verbinden__1", "type": "board_relation", "value": null, "text": null } ] } ] } } ] }, "extensions": { "request_id": "aea63278-8d4a-9aa6-a460-25fc93191820" }} I also tried with API version 2025-01 and get the same result. What is the reason for this?Any support on this is highly appreciated!

Hi everyone,We’ve compiled the most common migration-related questions you’ve raised into a new FAQ document.Feel free to take a look and let us know if anything is missing or if there’s a question we should add.https://developer.monday.com/apps/docs/automation-features-migration-faqs

Hello!We’ve recently migrated our old automation blocks from the legacy “Integration for sentence builder” feature to the new “Automation Block” feature. Using those automation blocks, we’ve also created “Automation templates”.The new application version is published & live into 40+ different monday.com accounts (our direct customers we are consulting with; the application is published but unlisted/private). ✅ When we test everything in our own monday.com account, everything works fine.❌ When we test in our clients’ monday.com accounts, the new automation UI does NOT work. I’ve racked my brain around all available settings and I am beginning to think that this is a bug and not a configuration issue. When creating a new automation and selecting one of our new templates, the automation window does not “expand” to the right automation. First video displays the intended behaviour. It was recorded in our own monday.com account:  The second video displays the buggy behaviour. It was reco