Recently active topics

Hello, I’m Moran Gibson, the Product Designer for the monday Apps Team, and I’m thrilled to announce that we’ve redesigned the left navigation sidebar in the Developer Center to enhance your experience. Our aim was to make navigation more intuitive and efficient. Here are some of the key improvements: 📂 Reorganized categories: We’ve restructured the categories to better represent a user-friendly flow. 🎨 Enhanced design: By adding icons and creating a collapsible menu, we’ve made the interface more visually appealing and functional. ⚡ Faster navigation: With a more organized structure, you can find what you need quicker than ever. We’d love to hear your feedback! Feel free to leave a comment here or write me directly in Slack. Moran Gibson Product Designer

Hi everyone,I'm developing an app that processes WorkDoc content. I am successfully using the blocks API to fetch the document structure, but I’ve hit a roadblock when trying to resolve embedded widgets (such as the Battery widget).The block payload returns a widgetId inside the stringified content field, like this: { "id": "86fec34c-4a0f-46fd-8cee-ad3c3d4e7bfc", "type": "widget", "content": "{\"type\":\"widget\",\"widgetId\":143752276,\"alignment\":\"left\",\"direction\":\"ltr\",\"widgetType\":\"EmbeddedSiteOverviewSection\",\"isCreatingWidget\":null,\"didNewLayoutMigration\":true}", "parent_block_id": null }In the Monday GraphQL schema, widgets cannot be queried at the root level - they normally require a parent dashboard(ids: [...]) query. However, because these widgets are embedded inside a WorkDoc, there is no parent Dashboard ID available.Is there an existing query, a specific nesting pattern, or a workarou

I am confused between Which pricing plan an automation app should have ?1) Seat Based2) Feature BasedDo I need to handle different scenarios before submitting app to monday Marketplace ?Or monday natively provides any options to work on the upgrade and downgrade of the plan I am having following questions while working with the plan and pricing ( If I am supposing the Feature based plan and pricing ) :1. On upgrade: what should happen to the automation count limit immediately?2. On upgrade: what should happen to existing automations that were within the old (lower) limit?3. On upgrade: what should happen to the monthly action count already consumed?4. On downgrade: what should happen to the automation count limit immediately?5. On downgrade: what should happen to existing automations that now exceed the new (lower) limit?6. On downgrade: what should happen to the monthly action count already consumed?7. Should the automation count and action count be linked — i.e. does creating more au

Quick question about instance-level storage. The monday.storage docs say:"The storage resets each time you introduce a new major version since each version has its own instances..."But the App Versioning docs say there's no such thing as major/minor versions anymore. Every version is just a full snapshot of the app, and "major versions" only get mentioned for apps from before Jan 2024.So which is it? If I promote a new live version, does instance storage actually get wiped, or does it stick around because the instance hasn't changed? The wording feels like it's describing the old versioning system and never got updated.If it does reset, is there a sane way to carry the data over to the new version? And if that "major version" wording is just outdated, any chance the docs could get fixed to match how versioning works now? Would save the next person the same confusion. Section's here: https://developer.monday.com/apps/docs/mondaystorage#instance-level

Hello Community,Is there any way to know if another developer is already working on a third-party integration before you start building?We ask because we recently went through the full development cycle for an integration, only to find out during the review process that a similar app had been published while we were building. The marketplace duplication policy then resulted in a rejection.It feels like there's a gap here for development teams who start in good faith when no integration exists, but then someone else publishes before them. Is there a formal way to flag your integration intent early, or an appeals process for cases like this?Thank you in advance.

OK, at some time there has been an undocumented change to the create_timeline_item mutation. You used to be able to send a timestamp in and it would respect that timestamp as the created_at  time.Example:mutation createTimelineEntry($customActivityId: String!, $itemId: ID!, $title: String!, $summary: String!, $content: String!, $timestamp: ISO8601DateTime!) { create_timeline_item( item_id: $itemId custom_activity_id: $customActivityId title: $title summary: $summary content: $content timestamp: $timestamp ) { id }}GraphQL Variables:{ "timestamp": "2024-05-08T11:34:39.000Z", "customActivityId": "e589f9c3-b4a7-4a7f-bcc1-d6164f4460b7", "itemId": 2957556816, "title": "🕰️ Historic walk around Sheffield", "summary": "Dear John\n\nThank you for signing up to the historic walk around Sheffield, starting at the Peace Gardens. \n\nThe walk will take in some of the city's most fascinating landmarks and stories, from its medieval origins through to its industrial heri

Let's say my app is an integration with M365/Outlook and has a trigger "When email is flagged in Outlook"...I need to create this automation block as a trigger with:A subscribe URL - create the incoming webhook subscription from Outlook to listen to events An unsubscribe URL -  deletes the incoming webhook from OutlookBoth of these will use the credentials feature and monday will pass me a valid, but short lived access token for use with Microsoft 365.Here's the hard part...I also need to regularly update the Microsoft Graph to renew the webhook subscription (as mail subscriptions expire after 3 days)This will need to be done with a monday-code cron job which:requests a new access token from monday for the correct user sends the webhook subscription renewal to MicrosoftIn the old infra, we’d use a credentials field and handle the logic ourselves, in our app, but with the new infra, the credentials are stored by monday and are abstracted away completely.👉 How do I request a new Microso

Hi! Please add the ability to get visibility into uninstall feedback in the developer center. 

I have a credentials block configured in my automation with scope x. I'm adding a new automation block that requires an additional scope y, so the combined scopes are now x y.New sign-ins will correctly receive the x y scope. However, users who previously authenticated only have the x scope stored.My question: When one of those existing automations runs for a user with only the x scope, what happens?Does the OAuth token refresh using the original x scope and continue to work? Or does it attempt a refresh with the new x y scope, fail due to the mismatch, and break the automation?Follow-up: If existing users do need to re-authenticate, what's the recommended way to surface that to them — is there a built-in mechanism in monday.com for prompting re-auth, or does that need to be handled manually?

I’m finalising our recipes as part of the migration, the last ones we have is to sync data from an external system to an item. In the sentance builder, we had a custom trigger than output a dynamic mapping object and we mapped this to “item mapping”.in the automation builder, the migration guide says to use “Item Values” now. We have a custom Trigger (“Object Created”) which outputs the custom object definition and a string of the objectIdWe also have an Action “Create item from 3rd party” which accepts a boardId, itemValues  and an external object id and then we have  the automation template joining these blocks together. This works fine in the Workflow Builder, it shows the Object from the previous trigger as expected. However it fails in the automation builder. It simply shows “No options available”. If I look at the network requests, I can see it retrieving my custom field defintions, it just doesn’t allow me to map my external data into columns to then process Has any been able to

Hi monday team,I’m debugging a monday-code live installation issue and wanted to confirm expected behavior for the signed JWT aud field.For a new user installing the live app, the authenticated request context contains this public base URL derived from aud:https://ee78c-service-14856766-dfa...But the expected live app URL is:https://live1-service-14856766-dfa...Example log:[userId=103522...] Authenticated monday request context: { accountId: 14856..., userId: 103522..., hasBackToUrl: true, hasShortLivedToken: true, publicBaseUrl: 'https://ee78c-service-14856766-dfa...' }We use the JWT aud value to build OAuth redirect URIs and Google Calendar webhook URLs. If aud can contain a transient/internal service URL instead of the canonical live URL, those redirects/webhooks may be registered against the wrong host.Is it expected that aud may point to a non-live monday-code service URL for live installations? Or should live app requests always include the canonical live URL in aud?If this is ex

Hi everyone,I'm running into an issue with the Apps Framework regarding custom automations, and I wanted to see if anyone else has experienced this or if it's a known bug.The Setup:I've built an integration that relies on a custom trigger for file uploads. In the setup, the user authorizes and selects their credentials, which are tied to their external platform's team ID and user ID.The Issue:When a user builds the automation from scratch using the custom recipe, everything works perfectly. The credentialsValues object is properly populated in the webhook payload, allowing us to route the request to the correct external team.However, when we package this exact same setup into an Automation Template and the user installs it, the webhook fires but the credentialsValues object drops entirely and comes through as empty ({}).I think this wouldn’t be the expected behaviour. 

Hi,I added an "action" feature and set up a dialog box to "large," but it doesn't take up that much space.Can I somehow render larger dialog?

Hello!With the deprecation of “Integration for sentence builder”, I need to migrate my existing workflow blocks to the new automation blocks. I’m struggling to reproduce the same behavior.My current, working sentence builder action works like this:When column changes → user selects the relevant column → user selects my action → user maps the fields.For example:When Registration changes → then set vehicle brand in >brand column<When the automation runs, monday sends the following parameters to my Run URL:boardId itemId columnId — the selected Registration column columnValue — the actual Registration value brandColumnId — the column where I should write the brandUsing these parameters, I can update the item through the GraphQL API.Below are the input fields from my old sentence builder action:Input fields of the old action in my integration for sentence builder With the new automation blocks, I tried to recreate the same behavior: the user enters a license plate/registration, and t

Hi,I need to include two separate views in the document. One that perfectly matches the "Doc Action" is great for "actions" called from the document content. Second, I want a top bar-level "button" that will show different content for that document. Can I use the "Doc toolbar AI assistant" because it seems to match my needs? However, my feature is not related to AI at all.

I've found a bug in the automation blocks If I use the content of a date column named `Date`, it will produce something like "11 March 2026" as the input field value. This is as expected.To get around this, we try using a formula column to get the date in the correct format that we want “YYYY-MM-DD”❌ If I then create a new formula column named "YYYY-MM-DD", and use the formula `FORMAT_DATE({Date}, "YYYY-MM-DD")`, it will still produce something like "11 March 2026" as the input field value, so this really is not behaving correctly❌ If I update the formula to `CONCATENATE("",FORMAT_DATE({Date}, "YYYY-MM-DD"), "")`, it will still produce something like "11 March 2026" as the input field value, so this really is not behaving✅ If I update the formula to `CONCATENATE("__",FORMAT_DATE({Date}, "YYYY-MM-DD"), "__")` it will then produce "__2026-03-11__" as the input field value, we get what we actually expected, but we’ve notw wrapped the correctly formatted date in extra characters.❌ If I upd

I recently connected Claude Chat to Monday. Claude said it created three new boards for me, but I can’t see them. We are subscribed to CRM and I just started the trial for Work Management. As the conversation with Claude progressed, it told me that via the connector it can only see the Main workspace. It can’t see CRM or Work Management. And I don’t see a Main workspace, only CRM and Work Management. How do I open up visibility so Claude can work in our CRM and Work Management workspaces?

For a Multi-level board, when I create a column of type Date, and then query the boards columns again, I do not see the Date column I just created returned via the API, even though I can see it was created in the UI.This also applies to the default Timeline column. Is this a bug?How can I get the Ids of a Date typed columns in order to insert the data into these columns via the API?

Hi everyone,I’ve been diving into the updates and it’s great to see the new support for querying multi-level subitems and the hierarchy_types: [multi_level] argument.However, I’ve hit a wall regarding programmatic creation. Currently, create_board seems to default to the classic structure. While we can now query deep hierarchies, I don't see a way to initialize a board as "Multi-Level" via the API.Are there plans to support multi-level boards creation via API?

I want to know the whole process from the scratch how to prepare app for the marketplace ?In terms of the security pricing and all related issues ?Is there any specific checklist to follow for this ?The app is deployed on the monday Code [Monday Server Side].

Hey, I know that it is possible to connect items in the Connect Boards column via the api, once the column is already connected to a board. I wonder, is there a way to connect a board if there is no board connected yet to the column? If so, how? Thanks!

I have create and application on the development center, then I have create a feature on the section of Board multi items menu but, when a select 3 items and go to my application I am only receiving a sessionToken in the request. I do not see a way to make a API call to retrieve the 3 selected items I have. How can I get my batch or context information with the items I had selected in order to execute my actions on those ids?? I am using API calls, no SDK at the moment. Please advise. Ronald

Hi everyone,I'm trying to post to a board's discussion section (not item-level updates) using the API. I can successfully read board-level updates using:query { boards(ids: [YOUR_BOARD_ID]) { updates(limit: 25, page: 1) { id body creator { id name } } }}However when trying to write, the create_update mutation only seems to support item_id — there's no board_id argument (confirmed via the playground autocomplete).Is there any workaround for posting to board-level discussion via the API? Or is this simply not supported as a write operation?Thanks!

Managing task ownership in monday.com can become messy during employee transitions, workload redistribution, or team restructuring.Most teams still manually update items one by one across multiple boards -- which takes a lot of time and effort.To simplify this process, we built Bulk Task Reassignment for monday.com.The app helps admins and managers:✅ Reassign tasks across multiple boards✅ Transfer ownership in bulk✅ Filter by workspace, folder, or board✅ Reassign people by status condition (ex: only Pending/In Progress/Done items)✅ Simplify employee offboarding workflows✅ Save hours of manual updatesMarketplace App:Bulk Task ReassignmentWould love feedback from the community on additional workflow use cases or features that could improve large-scale task management.