General

For context, I am creating a template that looks like; When a new item is created in board, create a task in reminders and sync all future updates. For this I need to create a trigger; When a new item in board is created in monday.com This trigger will create webhooks to for item creation and column updates And a new action; create a task in reminders and sync all future updates. This will create the task in the external app I would like to map an item in monday.com to a task in the external app. Currently I am having my trigger output an itemMapping and setting this as the source entity of the task in the action. I suspect the format of the itemMapping is incorrect though as the ta

Hi Team, I am not able to create new version of my app (Special Automations - 10182838) anymore. Kindly help in this regard ASAP. Please watched attached loom video (monday - Apps - 5 February 2025 | Loom) for more context. I have raised same request 2 times earlier through the support form (https://support.monday.com/hc/en-us/requests/new?ticket_form_id=13855862562962) and once through CEOs email, but still this issue has not been solved. It has been around 1 month now (I raised this on 5th Feb first), now customers have stopped believing me when I say that this is issue from monday end. This issue is causing frustration for me as well as customers as new automation requests are p

I am struggling to use ‘move_item_to_board’ despite having what I believe to be the correct column mapping. I keep getting an error saying the column mapping is not correct. I have outputted the source board’s columns to double check, but it looks correct to me: [0] [nodemon] restarting due to changes… [0] [nodemon] starting node ./src/app.js [0] (node:91487) [DEP0040] DeprecationWarning: The punycode module is deprecated. Please use a userland alternative instead. [0] (Use node --trace-deprecation ... to show where the warning was created) [0] Transform text integration listening on port 8302 [0] Retrieved columns for board 1817479461: [ [0] { id: ‘name’, type: ‘name’, title: ‘Name’ }, [0] { id: ‘subitems_mkka1888’, type: ‘subtasks’, title: ‘Subitems’ }, [0] { id: ‘listen_link_Mjj8kFYr’, type: ‘link’, title: ‘Listen’ }, [0] { id: ‘creation_log_mkkapaxr’, type: ‘creation_log’, titl

I’m dealing with API rate limiting in my application and looking for established patterns to handle this effectively. Currently, my retry mechanism implementation feels messy and difficult to maintain. Questions: What are the recommended best practices for handling API rate limits in production applications? How should retry mechanisms be implemented to handle rate limit responses efficiently? Are there any well-tested libraries or patterns that handle this elegantly? Current approach: I’m currently implementing my own retry logic, but it’s becoming increasingly complex and hard to maintain.

Hi everyone. I would like to know your opinion about the upgrading/downgrading process of a plan under the monetization system. First question As far as I know, when a user upgrades to a higher plan, monday applies a pro-rata price and the plan is immediately activated. Similarly, when a user downgrades to a lower plan, the plan is immediately activated, but no refund is issued. If this is the case, I think the process is not correct. If no refund is issued, at least the lower plan should be activated at the subscription renewal. Second question As said, when a user upgrades to a higher plan, a pro-rata price is applied. This is correct if your subscription model is based entirely on the time. But that’s not correct with other models. For example, in General Caster the small plan offers 5k ops/month (70 USD) and the medium plan offers 25k ops/month (140 USD). If a user with the small plan c

Hi Team, In my app, I need to execute a background task to retrieve information from several boards. These boards may be restricted to some users. If I use OAuth user authentication to authorize the background process, the user granting the authorization might not have permission on the boards, causing the background task to fail. Is it possible to configure a service account or app account to execute this background task without a user context? Thanks in advance, Carlos

While creating an board through api, it is by default creating a item type board but i want to create a Campaign type board, is there any way if yes then tell or how to retrieve template_id of a campaign type board

[quote=“Soma Garamvögyi, post:1, topic:107682, username:Garam”] ding a HTML file that points to status.monday.com, saying there are some technical issues. HTTP 403 - Forbidden HTTP 200 - Success - with the following message: 0 message:Variable $file of type File! was provided invalid value locations 0 line:1 column:10 extensions value:[null] problems 0 path:[empty array] explanation:Expected value to not be null i have problem/ this code return internak serer error’ why? string mutation = $@" add_file_to_column (item_id: {itemId}, column_id: ““files_mkn0mwm9"”, file: “”{base64String}”“) {{ id }}”; mutations.Add(mutation); // } string query = $@" mutation {{ {string.Join("\\n", mutations)} }} "; var requestBody = new { query }; var json = JsonConvert.SerializeObject

The API reference is not entirely clear, but it does not appear that you can create new mirror columns: You can read the mirror column via the API, but you cannot filter, update, or clear it. This seems rather unfortunate if true, and the reference needs to be revised to make that clear. The API currently returns the following error when trying to add a new mirror column to a board that has an existing connected board with other mirror columns already present: errors: { error_message: 'This column type is not supported yet in the API', error_code: 'InvalidColumnTypeException', error_data: { column_id: null, actual_type: 'lookup' }, status_code: 200, ... } At the very least it would be very helpful to be able to add additional mirror columns to a board if a link to the connect boards is already present.

I created an app, and to use it at scale, I started using the Monday queue. When I send a message using the Python SDK, I receive an API response with a message ID. However, according to the documentation, the queue should send the message back to the /mndy-queue endpoint, but I am not receiving it. What could be the issue?

Hello everybody! Some time ago (about a month ago) My tool worked fine, uploading files to monday via the API Now I’m getting an error: {"errors":[{"message":"'content-type' header must be one of: \\\\"application/json\\\\" or \\\\"application/graphql-response+json\\\\"","extensions":{"code":"INVALID_CONTENT_TYPE_HEADER"}}],"account_id":null} I use multiloading of files by sending a request for each file in turn. my TS(javascript) code for (const file of files) { const formData = new FormData() formData.append( 'query', ` mutation($file: File!) { add_file_to_column( file: $file, item_id: ${id} column_id: "${columnId}", ) { id } } ` ) formData.append('variables[file]', file) const resp

Hi buddy devs. We have just received a communication from Payoneer saying they are updating their payment terms. Basically, if I correct understand it, they will apply a 1% fee on all app payouts we receive from monday (not to mention the fancy USD->foreign currency conversion rate they arbitrarily apply). Here’s the complete statement: https://payoneer.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/45201 What do you think?

Fetching tunnel connection auth token [FAILED: Unexpected error occurred while communicating with the remote server] Currently seeing this error, when the tunnel worked previously a couple of days ago.

Hi all, I am using the above current API version with latest monday-sdk-js@0.5.6. It seems, that the content of updates (with limit 1) is null when querying items with the API. When I test the same query in the API playground, the updates result has valid content. It also worked with older API version 2023-10 which is no longer usable. Is this maybe a bug or do I have to change anything? Thanks in advance. Best regards, Marcus

Hello to everyone, I don’t understand if the api 2025-01 are officially released. On monday.com Platform API Someone can please give me a hint? I don’t understand what’s wrong. Thank you Davide

Your API requires the use of multiple levels of nested escaped JSON. For example, when using create_item to set column values. Individual column values may contain newlines and quotes, which need to be escaped. The column_values argument needs to be converted to JSON, so its quotes and newlines need to be escaped, plus the ones in any individual column values need to be escaped a second time. Then the mutation GraphQL document itself also need to be assigned to the query property of a JSON object qhich requires escaping the entire mutation document again. There are multiple ways this nested escaping could be done. After much trial and error I have found that one format that works for create_item is this {"query":"mutation {\\r\\n create_item (\\r\\n board_id: 6172423554, \\r\\n item_name: \\"TEst9\\", \\r\\n column_values: \\"{\\\\\\"note\\\\\\":\\\\\\"Newline\\\\\\nStuff\\\\\\\\\\\\\\"Quot

Hi, I am signed up for monday.com free account. And would like to integrate nodejs app into monday.com. I am following instruction https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wc86Mahz6yc&t=544s to create simple app in monday.com But i realised that there’s no “hosting” option in the feature, see below screenshot.

Hi, I hope someone can help with this. I have an app where I want to update values in a board group. I have a Board group menu feature which does exactly what I want. It opens up a dialog and the end user enters values, and I can update the columns I need. But after doing that I want to close the dialog and reset my internal variables ready for the next menu action. I can’t find a way to do that. moday.execute ‘closeDialog’ crashes, ‘closeAppFeatureModal’ doesn’t crash but doesn’t close the dialog either. How can I do this. Many thanks for your help.

app_subscriptions and marketplace_app_discounts are API objects that appear in the playground. But when we download the SDL, that schema does not include them. Its like the SDL is only generated for the customer account side of the API, not the full API that includes the developer side. The distinction is just a permissions issue based on token - and maybe different development teams. Its the same API endpoint so the same API. Either way, its a pain because autocompletions and validations based on the schema fail if we try to use them. I am not making this a feature request because this is a BUG. Somebody forgot to include these resolvers in the public schema - the schema doesn’t match the API. That is a bug/error/flaw/omission. Its not a missing feature. EDIT the introspection query does return the full correct schema though. It is just SDL/JSON formatted ones available for download that are wrong. Oddly you’d think they’d use tooling to

Hey, everyone! Quick one. I have this 7pace integration and I need to pull the time tracking using monday API. But there’s no way I can get the right data. 7pace App creates a custom_objects called All Times (it’s not a regular board persei). When I get all boards inside my 7pace workspace this All Times comes listed, but when I try to get items I’m not able to get the right rows (it brings a few rows that seem wrong or out dated). Hope any of you have run into this before! Thank you, all

Hi all 🙂 I’m currently in the process of building a custom action for an integration app feature. I’m wondering how I can possibly utilize the following built-in input fields: It doesn’t seem like there is a built-in way to create/assign dependencies for these input fields to rely on (without creating my own custom triggers/fields), as both of them seem to give this (l

Queries like getting the columns data or items were working fine in automation scripts till yesterday .Today we see 400 Bad Request . They work fine with POST , was there any upgrade overnight ? Will GET not be supported in future? Using 2023-10 API version.

Hi all, I am trying to connect a PowerAutomate flow to Monday’s webhook automation. Clearly the PowerAutomate receives the webhook, because my flow runs every time I try to CONNECT and I get the challenge JSON in PowerAutomate. However, in Monday.com, there isn’t a connection established after this and I get error message: ‘Failed to communicate with URL provided’. I think this is likely due to MS PowerAutomate not sending the challenge-response back to Monday. Does anyone know how to circumvent this issue?

Hello Monday Community members, Customer feedback is incredibly valuable to us as it guides our efforts in enhancing the user experience and adding valuable features to our products. I am the representative of my organization & our app Links explorer is listed on monday.com marketplace. However, we are unable to engage with our customers to gather their insights, address their concerns, and incorporate their suggestions into our development process. Hence, I respectfully wanted to inquire about the most efficient method to connect with the users linked to the purchases of our LXP - Link Explorer add-on. This would facilitate communication with our customers, nurturing a collaborative relationship focused on delivering tailored solutions to meet their requirements.

HI There, We are getting 200 status code with 2025-01 instead of 429 in an event where the complexity budget is exhausted. See the picture below. The 2024-10 version correctly returns 429 error code with Retry-After header. Can you please fix this? Thanks