New `items_page` does not accept specified item ids

You need to send the item IDs in the query_params argument:

query {
  boards (ids:4579962334) {
    items_page(query_params:{ids:4579963913}) {
      items {
        id
        board {
          id
        }
      }
    }
  }
}

As for why it’s a step backwards; I don’t fully understand. In the previous version you also had to nest the items query inside a boards query. What’s missing?

You do still have the option of returning items by ID directly, using the root items query:

query {
  items (ids:12345) {
    id
  }
}

Hello @dipro,

Thank you for your answer. I did try your answer and I was expecting the item id and name as part of the result but got nothing.

Also, concerning the items query, do I correctly understand that, items can still be used as a root query, provided an id or ids are specified and must not always be nested under the new items_page query?
If yes, what does this part of the documentation mean then?

1. Queries that use items must nest them in the items_page object

Hey, thanks for the quick response.

Regarding the items query – yes, you are correct. You can still use items as a root query.

Regarding the documentation – great catch, I wrote that sentence and realize how it’s unclear/wrong. 🙁 I will update it to the following:

Queries that use items inside the boards or groups object must nest them in the items_page object

Regarding getting no data for the above item – looks like a mistake in your query or a bug. Can you do the following basic troubleshooting and, if it still fails, open a ticket?

• Check the item and board IDs are accurate
• Check the logged-in user has access to the items and boards
• Check that the item has not been deleted/archived
• Check that the board or group has not been deleted/archived

Hello @dipro,
Thanks for the response and also the troubleshooting ideas. It helped. I had mistakenly used the wrong board id.
Looking forward to the updates in the documentation

4 posts were split to a new topic: Trouble using new API version

Hello @dipro,

If I understand correctly, previous queries for groups that looked like this

{
  boards(ids: BOARD_IDS) {
    groups(ids: [GROUP_IDS]) {
        items {
          id
        }
    }
  }
}

should now look like this:

{
  boards(ids: BOARD_IDS) {
    groups(ids: [GROUP_IDS]) {
      items_page {
        cursor
        items {
          id
        }
      }
    }
  }
}

The only problem is, the latter does not work and the api throws an error that "Field 'items_page' doesn't exist on type 'Group'"

Hello there @kolaai,

The second query should work now. We had a small issue that was fixed.

I just tested the following query succesfully:

{
  boards(ids: 1234567890) {
    groups(ids: ["topics"]) {
      items_page {
        cursor
        items {
          id
        }
      }
    }
  }
}

Let me know how that goes!

Cheers,
Matias

Alright @Matias.Monday . Thank you 🙂

Happy to help @kolaai !

Hi Matias,
does this code still works now?

im trying to code in python with the same structure, but it fails

query = { boards(ids: 123456789) { groups(ids:['my_group_id']) { items_page(limit:10) { items {id name} } } } } 

payload = {'query' : query}
r = requests.post(url=api_url, json=payload, headers=headers) # make request

data = r.json()

any help will be so greatful! thank you!

Hello there @Celia and welcome to the community!

I hope you like it here 💪

The query itself looks good to me (I would use double quotes instead of simple quotes).

Regarding the Python syntax, I do not have experience with it so I wouldn’t be able to comment on that.

Cheers,
Matias